Groups of what? I just walked by the (former) eGroups building and noticed the tag line: "The easiest way for groups of people to communicate." I thought, that's a little wordy, couldn't they have just said, "The easiest way for groups to communicate"? Then, I thought, someone probably really wanted to put "people" in there, because it's all about people. Warm fuzziness and all that. Or perhaps they really thought people might actually think, "Oh great, my group of goldfish can use eGroups to communicate." And then they'd be misled because they can't really. I think. And also, it's obviously not as easy to use eGroups as to sit in a room and talk. Maybe they should have been more specific. I bet someone wanted to say, "The easiest way for groups of people to communicate online." And someone else said, "No, of course it's online, that's what the 'e' means. Besides, it easier than sitting in a room if the group is geographically dispersed. So there!" And so on. I'm sure there was much debate. And yes, these are the things I think about while I'm enjoying an incredibly lovely day, strolling back from lunch in the park to my dark, basement office.